Thread:135.23.253.99/@comment-27013423-20160814234411/@comment-27013423-20160815013004

Having members of the official members of the development staff is common practice and I've seen it before. A translator might not be as common, but Maria and Aru in particular being the main translators that brought Alicesoft staff in english are the main reason why there even is a western fanbase, and they're official now. I believe they are important enough to have an article dedicated to them as much as members of the Alicesoft staff do.

If you think I'm abusing my privileges as an admin you must not have seen many wikis in general. You made an edit removing everything in a page, without previously talking with anyone and without giving any explanation whatsoever. In any other wiki, you'd have been banned on the spot for vandalism with such a self-centered behavior.

All that aside, about the article itself. From what I understand your biggest issue with the page is the fact that it implies that there were more people against Maria than there were supporting her. I hate to burst your bubble, but that's more or less a fact. I don't personally have any grudge against her, if anything I respect her for all the work she's done to bring Alicesoft products on the west, but that is what many people felt. You can agree or not with that feeling, but it's undeniable that is what happened. There are some parts that probably could have been phrased better, I agree. The part of the "hopless scenario for upcoming translations" is simply how many people felt. Why do you think the western Alicesoft fanbase has been so dead this last year? Why do you think that the post where she made the Haruka announcement had over 130 comments while the one in which she informed about the game's release had less than 10? Just to give an example. Supporting her or not is debatable, but the reaction of the fanbase is not. I agree that some parts of the article might sound derogatory in a way, you're free to word it differently if you feel like it should be changed. Infact, I encourage you to rephrase the article until you're satisfied if you wish. The page is meant to give an explanation of the incident that sounds as even-handed as possible. If it fails then that's more of a reason for you to edit it, not to delete it, let alone without even giving a summary like in your first edit.

I believe I explain what you're not allowed to do, so I removed the restriction on the page. You can word it differently if you wish, but if you repeat the same action as before will be taken as nothing but trolling and punished accordingly.